Court Reform

Thumbnail
Author(s)
Bedner, Adriaan
Language
English
Show full item record
Abstract
Three types of strategies have been common for court reform programmes: the ‘holistic’, the ‘tactical’, and the ‘strategic’ approach. This Research and Policy Note discusses strategic court reform and its underlying ideas. Its main intention is to alert those involved in judicial reform to some of the pitfalls and choices connected to particular types of interventions. The concluding remarks will comment on the political nature of judicial reform and on a model to design a proper sequence of interventions for judicial reform.
URI
http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32881
Keywords
law; reform; court systems; Accountability; Alternative dispute resolution; Case law; Civil law (legal system); Developing country; Dispute resolution; Indonesia; Judicial independence; Judicial reform; Procedural law
DOI
10.24415/9789087280505
Publisher
Leiden University Press
Publisher website
https://www.lup.nl/
Publication date and place
2008
Series
Law, Governance, and Development,
Classification
Legal systems: courts and procedures
Public remark
Relevant Wikipedia pages: Accountability - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accountability; Alternative dispute resolution - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolution; Case law - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_law; Civil law (legal system) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_(legal_system); Developing country - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country; Dispute resolution - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute_resolution; Indonesia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia; Judicial independence - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_independence; Judicial reform - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_reform; Procedural law - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedural_law
Rights
All rights reserved